How do you ensure accessibility in UI development?

Long Answer

Accessibility is fundamental in UI development. It ensures that products are usable by everyone, including people with disabilities, and meets regulatory compliance. As a UI Developer, I adopt a systematic approach to integrate accessibility into all components and workflows.

1) Semantic-first development

I begin with semantic HTML: using <button> for actions, <nav> for navigation, <header>/<main>/<footer> for landmarks, and <label> with <input>. Semantics provide meaning that screen readers and assistive technologies can interpret without relying on extra attributes.

2) Keyboard navigation

Keyboard accessibility is non-negotiable. My practices include:

• Ensuring tab order follows logical flow.
  
• Providing visible focus indicators, customized but always high-contrast.
  
• Supporting Enter/Space activation consistently for buttons and links.
  
• Using Escape/Arrow keys for modals, menus, and dropdowns.
  
• Focus trapping inside dialogs and restoring focus to the opener when closed.
  

3) ARIA roles and states

Where HTML falls short, I use ARIA thoughtfully:

• role="dialog" with aria-modal="true" for modals.
  
• aria-expanded, aria-controls, and aria-haspopup for dropdowns and accordions.
  
• aria-current or aria-selected for navigation states.
  
• aria-describedby for error messages tied to form inputs.
  I avoid ARIA overuse, as replacing semantic HTML with div role="button" is harmful.
  

4) WCAG standards

I apply WCAG 2.2 principles (POUR):

• Perceivable: Adequate contrast, text alternatives for images, captions for media.
  
• Operable: Keyboard navigation, skip links, no time-limited tasks without controls.
  
• Understandable: Consistent navigation, clear labels, predictable interactions.
  
• Robust: Compatible with assistive technologies, validated markup, and ARIA roles.
  

5) Handling dynamic content

Dynamic UIs must communicate state changes. For example, a “3 items in cart” update triggers an aria-live="polite" region. Loading spinners announce progress with role="status". Modals and alerts use appropriate ARIA attributes for clarity.

6) Inclusive design considerations

Accessibility goes beyond technical compliance:

• Color independence: Icons or text accompany color indicators.
  
• Reduced motion: Animations respect prefers-reduced-motion.
  
• Error recovery: Forms provide clear messages, inline errors, and guidance.
  
• Cognitive support: Simple language and logical flow reduce friction.
  

7) Testing strategies

Accessibility must be verified. I combine:

• Automated tools: axe-core, Lighthouse, pa11y.
  
• Manual keyboard testing: Every component tested without a mouse.
  
• Assistive technology: NVDA, JAWS, and VoiceOver.
  
• Cross-device testing: Mobile screen readers (TalkBack, iOS VoiceOver).
  

8) Example in practice

For a custom dropdown:

• Trigger is a <button> with aria-expanded and aria-controls.
  
• Options are <ul role="listbox"> with aria-selected.
  
• Supports arrow navigation, Escape close, focus management, and ARIA announcements.
  This ensures the component is fully accessible across devices and assistive tech.
  
  

By following WCAG, building semantically, and validating with real users and tools, I ensure inclusive, accessible UIs that serve everyone.

‍

Table

‍

Common Mistakes

• Relying only on automated audits without manual testing.
  
• Using <div> or <span> with click handlers instead of semantic elements.
  
• Removing focus outlines for aesthetics.
  
• Overusing ARIA roles when native HTML is sufficient.
  
• Forgetting to announce dynamic updates (cart totals, alerts).
  
• Using color alone to convey status (green = success, red = error).
  
• Ignoring mobile accessibility, especially touch targets and screen readers.
  
• Not testing with screen readers, assuming compliance equals usability.
  
• Skipping reduced-motion settings and forcing parallax or autoplay.
  
• Treating accessibility as a post-launch checklist instead of design requirement.
  
  

Sample Answers

Junior:
“I build with semantic HTML and make sure all elements can be reached via tab. I keep focus outlines visible and run Lighthouse checks for accessibility scores. For forms, I use labels and simple error messages tied with aria-describedby.”

Mid:
“I integrate WCAG into daily work. Dropdowns have aria-expanded states, modals trap focus, and forms announce errors with ARIA. I test with NVDA and keyboard-only flows, and run axe-core in CI pipelines. Color is never the sole indicator of state.”

Senior:
“I embed accessibility into design systems. Every component has semantic defaults, ARIA roles for dynamic behavior, and WCAG contrast ratios baked in. I enforce performance and accessibility budgets in CI. We test on desktop and mobile screen readers, integrate reduced-motion options, and validate with users. Accessibility is part of acceptance criteria, not optional.”

‍

Evaluation Criteria

• Semantic discipline: Proper HTML elements used before ARIA.
  
• Keyboard operability: Tab order, visible focus, key bindings, focus traps.
  
• Screen reader clarity: Roles, labels, live regions, announcements.
  
• WCAG adherence: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust.
  
• Inclusive design awareness: Motion, color, cognitive load.
  
• Testing maturity: Mix of automated and manual tests, desktop and mobile.
  
• Process rigor: Accessibility criteria embedded in design systems and acceptance tests.
  Red flags: Hidden focus, misuse of ARIA, no manual testing, accessibility treated as compliance-only.
  
  

Preparation Tips

• Review WCAG 2.2 guidelines and how they apply to common UI patterns.
  
• Practice building accessible modals, forms, and dropdowns.
  
• Learn ARIA attributes like aria-expanded, aria-live, aria-describedby.
  
• Test projects with NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack.
  
• Integrate automated audits into CI/CD.
  
• Familiarize with reduced-motion media queries and WCAG color contrast rules.
  
• Draft an accessibility checklist for every component.
  
• Rehearse explaining how accessibility improves usability for everyone.
  
  

Real-world Context

Retail site: Adding aria-live to cart updates improved checkout for screen reader users.
Healthcare portal: Error messages were invisible to AT. Adding aria-describedby and visible inline text reduced patient confusion.
Finance dashboard: Modals previously leaked focus to background; fixing with role="dialog" and focus trap cut abandonment.
Media app: Replaced autoplay animations with reduced-motion alternatives; task success for motion-sensitive users improved.

These case studies show that accessibility is usability, not just compliance, and makes products more robust and inclusive.

‍

Key Takeaways

• Semantic HTML first; ARIA only when necessary.
  
• Ensure full keyboard navigation with visible focus.
  
• Apply WCAG principles systematically.
  
• Announce dynamic changes with ARIA live regions.
  
• Validate with both automated tools and real assistive tech.
  
  

Practice Exercise

Scenario:
You’re building a UI library with a modal, dropdown, and form. The client requires full WCAG compliance.

Tasks:

1. Modal: Implement with <dialog> or <div role="dialog">, focus trap, aria-labelledby, Escape close, and restore focus.
   
2. Dropdown: <button> trigger with aria-expanded/aria-controls; items inside <ul role="listbox">; arrow keys navigate; aria-selected for state.
   
3. Form: Every input paired with <label>. Errors announced with inline text + aria-describedby. Required fields marked programmatically.
   
4. Motion: Add prefers-reduced-motion styles. Replace transitions with instant states when active.
   
5. Testing: Run keyboard-only flows, Lighthouse audits, axe-core scans, and manual NVDA/VoiceOver validation.
   
6. Document acceptance criteria: visible focus, tab order, ARIA roles, error announcements, and color independence.
   
   

Deliverable:
A small demo app showing accessible modal, dropdown, and form components, tested against WCAG standards with automated and manual validation, proving mastery of UI accessibility in development.