Vetting process
Table of Contents
The vetting process is a structured series of steps used to evaluate and confirm the suitability, skills, and trustworthiness of a candidate before hiring.
Full Definition
Vetting is more than a checklist — it’s the foundational process that separates promising applicants from true hires. It combines automated and human steps designed to uncover not just technical skills but also attitude, integrity, and contextual fit.
While interviews play a key role, the vetting process is broader. It may include skills assessments, background checks, reference validation, soft skill evaluation, and cultural alignment checks.
A rigorous vetting process reduces hiring risk, shortens time-to-productivity, and boosts retention. In remote hiring models, it also ensures that asynchronous communication, self-direction, and motivation are vetted alongside skills.
Use Cases
- Scaling teams quickly — Ensure candidates are pre-qualified before interviews begin.
- Remote-first hiring — Assess traits like autonomy and communication that don’t show on a CV.
- Freelancer platforms — Filter candidates before project matching.
- Subscription hiring models — Provide ongoing talent that’s already been fully vetted.
- VC hiring pods — Support portfolio companies with access to verified, ready-to-go candidates.
Visual Funnel
Application → Screening → Skills Assessment → Culture Fit Interview → References → Offer
Frameworks
- 3-Layer Vetting Model
- Layer 1: Hard Skills — Portfolio reviews, technical assessments, coding tests.
- Layer 2: Soft Skills — Communication exercises, situational judgment tests.
- Layer 3: Trust & Fit — Reference checks, async test tasks, team alignment.
- STAR-Based Behavioral Vetting — Focuses on real-life scenarios through Situation, Task, Action, Result to understand candidate decision-making.
- Vetting Flywheel — Iterative model where candidate vetting data improves future filtering, interview questions, and predictive hiring success.
Common Mistakes
- Over-reliance on CVs — Resumes can hide red flags or inflate competence.
- Lack of standardization — Inconsistent processes between roles or departments.
- Bias in human stages — Without structured rubrics, vetting becomes subjective.
- Skipping cultural vetting — Leading to misalignment in values or work style.
- Speed over depth — Rushing through steps for fast hiring leads to long-term risk.
Etymology
The term "vetting" originates from the early 1800s, derived from the verb "to vet," which meant "to evaluate or examine thoroughly." It comes from the world of horse racing, where a veterinarian had to examine a horse before it was allowed to race. Over time, the term expanded beyond animals to general use in politics, hiring, and security.
In recruiting, "vetting" became commonplace in the late 20th century as companies sought more formalized ways to reduce hiring risk, particularly in sensitive or high-stakes roles.
Localization
- EN: Vetting process
- DE: Auswahlverfahren / Sorgfaltspflicht
- FR: Processus de sélection rigoureux
- ES: Proceso de evaluación
- UA: Процес перевірки кандидатів
- PL: Proces weryfikacji
Comparison: Vetting process vs Interview process
Mentions in Media
Indeed explains that the vetting process is how employers verify the truth and accuracy of a candidate’s information—such as documents and background—before hiring.
TechTarget defines employee vetting as a screening process that checks a new hire’s background—including employment, education, licenses, social media, credit, and criminal records—to identify potential risk.
Investopedia describes vetting as a thorough investigation of an individual or entity—like due diligence—to support informed decision-making and mitigate risk.
OPM outlines that the vetting process involves investigation, evaluation, and adjudication to determine suitability for sensitive federal roles, including background checks and official reviews.
PersonaTalent explains that employee vetting is a comprehensive process used by employers to confirm candidates’ backgrounds, qualifications, and role suitability before hiring.
HuntClub describes the vetting process as a thorough evaluation beyond interviews—including background and reference checks—to ensure candidate reliability and fit.
KPIs & Metrics
- Pass Rate per Stage — Measures drop-off across different vetting checkpoints.
- Time per Vetting Step — Helps streamline processes without compromising depth.
- Hire-to-Fail Ratio — Number of vetted hires that churn within 90 days.
- Referral-to-Vetted Ratio — Shows which sourcing channels yield the most vettable candidates.
- Candidate Feedback Score — Measures perceived fairness and clarity of vetting.
- Background Check Accuracy — Tracks success rate of verified references or credentials.
Top Digital Channels
- Codility / HackerRank / TestGorilla — Hard skill assessments
- HiPeople / Checkr — Reference and background validation
- Typeform / Google Forms — Async questionnaires for behavioral vetting
- Loom / VidGrid — Recorded video answers for async team fit evaluation
- LinkedIn Recruiter — Initial candidate screening + message-based outreach
Tech Stack
- ATS: Greenhouse, Lever, Workable — to manage candidate flow and stages
- Assessment Platforms: DevSkiller, Toggl Hire, Codility
- Communication Tools: Slack, Calendly, Loom
- Background & ID Checks: Checkr, Veremark, Truework
- Documentation & Rubrics: Notion, Confluence, Google Workspace
Understanding via Related Terms
Seeing vetting process through the lens of candidate vetting shows how systematic checks ensure applicants meet the required skills, experience, and integrity standards.
Relating vetting process to pre-vetted talent highlights how a robust screening system creates a pool of reliable candidates ready for quick placement.
Understanding vetting process alongside verified candidate demonstrates how thorough evaluation directly supports presenting only trusted, high-quality hires to employers.
Join Wild.Codes Early Access
Our platform is already live for selected partners. Join now to get a personal demo and early competitive advantage.

