Considering 99designs as a Wild.Codes alternative?

47h match time
vetted developers delivered within two days, faster than 99designs’ project cycle.
$0 placement fees
transparent subscription model with no commissions or contest costs.
1.5-year retention
long-term team integration versus short-term creative projects.
Wild.Codes vs
99designs
High-performance hiring with Wild.Codes
Receive a curated shortlist of senior developers in just 47 hours — matched to your stack, culture, and roadmap goals.
Our developers stay because they grow — supported by training, community, and success management that drive real retention.
Only 5 % of applicants join our Talent Cloud — engineers who value ownership, clarity, and startup-ready mindset.
Trusted by founders
and tech leaders
Sometimes it’s very complicated for us to find highly skilled developers, but these guys did it perfectly.
Sometimes it’s very complicated for us to find highly skilled developers, but these guys did it perfectly.
Sometimes it’s very complicated for us to find highly skilled developers, but these guys did it perfectly.
Sometimes it’s very complicated for us to find highly skilled developers, but these guys did it perfectly.
FAQ
Still got questions?
1. Introduction: Why Compare Wild.Codes and 99designs
Both Wild.Codes and 99designs help companies access global talent — but they operate in entirely different industries.
99designs is a creative marketplace for designers, illustrators, and branding professionals.
Wild.Codes, by contrast, is a developer hiring platform built for SaaS companies, startups, and tech scale-ups that need vetted engineers quickly.
This comparison examines the contrast between creative outsourcing and technical team scaling — speed, pricing, and long-term value.
2. Understanding 99designs’ Business Model
99designs connects clients with a worldwide community of designers.
Clients either post a design contest — where multiple freelancers submit ideas — or hire a designer directly.
While the platform is efficient for one-off creative needs like logos, web layouts, or brand identities, it’s not built for ongoing or technical collaboration.
The pricing model depends on contest level, prize amount, and designer tier — often leading to varied costs and timelines.
3. How Wild.Codes Works
Wild.Codes operates as a subscription-based hiring service that delivers pre-vetted developers in under 47 hours.
Instead of posting ads or contests, companies subscribe to a monthly plan and gain access to engineers ready to join their team.
The process includes technical assessments, communication testing, and cultural fit verification — ensuring reliability and retention.
Wild.Codes bridges the gap between speed and quality, helping teams scale transparently and efficiently.
4. Key Difference: Subscription Hiring vs Creative Marketplace
The contrast between Wild.Codes and 99designs lies in intent and outcome.
99designs specializes in visual creation, not ongoing team building.
Wild.Codes focuses on long-term integration, helping tech companies add full-time engineers directly to their workflows.
Where 99designs delivers projects, Wild.Codes delivers people — vetted, available, and aligned with your product goals.
5. Vetting and Talent Quality
99designs relies on designer profiles, portfolios, and client ratings to determine quality.
There’s no centralized or technical vetting — the responsibility falls on the client.
Wild.Codes performs rigorous screening, from technical coding assessments to soft-skill interviews, approving only 5% of applicants.
That ensures you get professionals ready to perform from day one, without the uncertainty of contest-driven work.
6. Pricing and Cost Transparency
99designs uses tiered pricing based on contest level or designer reputation.
While flexible, this can lead to unpredictable total spend — depending on revisions, rounds, and custom agreements.
Wild.Codes eliminates all variables with a flat monthly fee per developer, covering everything from sourcing to replacement if needed.
For SaaS teams managing tight budgets, cost stability becomes a core advantage.
7. Speed and Time-to-Hire
Wild.Codes delivers shortlists within 47 hours, cutting typical hiring time by weeks.
99designs contests take longer: posting briefs, waiting for submissions, reviewing dozens of entries, and then finalizing a winner.
That structure fits creative iteration but not engineering deadlines.
When product teams need developers fast, Wild.Codes’ instant matching model drives true time-to-value.
8. Talent Pool and Global Reach
99designs has one of the world’s largest design communities — millions of creative professionals across 190+ countries.
Wild.Codes, meanwhile, curates a global developer network from Europe, Latin America, and Asia — with focus on coding quality, communication, and time-zone flexibility.
Both are global, but Wild.Codes’ scope is narrower by design, specializing in tech hires with proven product experience.
9. Technology, Automation, and Process
Wild.Codes integrates AI-driven matching that scores candidates by skills, engagement metrics, and predicted retention.
This data-driven system minimizes manual review and ensures precision.
99designs, while a strong creative community, relies on manual selection, portfolio browsing, and contest voting — processes centered on creativity, not automation.
10. Integration and Long-Term Engagement
Wild.Codes developers become part of your internal team — participating in sprints, standups, and version control.
There’s full ownership and communication transparency.
99designs designers are independent contractors working per project, with limited continuity after delivery.
If your goal is to grow a tech department, Wild.Codes supports integration rather than transactions.
11. Retention and Project Continuity
Wild.Codes developers stay with clients for an average of 1.5 years, ensuring stability and knowledge retention.
99designs projects typically end once a design is approved — with optional re-hire only if the freelancer is available.
This difference defines the value each provides: short-term output versus sustained capacity.
12. Brand Reputation and Market Fit
99designs is globally recognized as a leader in creative marketplaces, trusted by businesses for branding and design work.
Wild.Codes represents the next generation of hiring — merging tech recruitment with SaaS efficiency and transparent pricing.
Both are trusted in their fields, but Wild.Codes caters specifically to the developer economy, not the gig-based creative one.
13. Who Should Choose Wild.Codes
Choose Wild.Codes if you:
- Need vetted developers within days, not weeks.
- Want predictable monthly pricing with no middlemen.
- Are building or scaling a SaaS or tech startup.
Wild.Codes gives you a dedicated hiring engine, designed for flexibility and long-term collaboration.
14. When 99designs Makes Sense
99designs is perfect for companies needing:
- Logo design, branding, or UI/UX concepts.
- Short creative projects that don’t require long-term engagement.
- A wide choice of visual directions via contests.
For creative output, 99designs excels; for team scalability, Wild.Codes wins.
15. Final Verdict: Wild.Codes vs 99designs
Wild.Codes and 99designs both empower businesses through talent access — but their missions differ.
99designs offers creative solutions for visual identity and design.
Wild.Codes enables fast, transparent, and reliable developer hiring for growing SaaS and product teams.
If your goal is to scale your tech team efficiently and sustainably, Wild.Codes is the clear, long-term alternative to 99designs.
Table of Contents



