Considering 99designs as a Wild.Codes alternative?

Explore how Wild.Codes compares to 99designs — from sourcing model and pricing to hiring speed, automation, and scalability for modern tech teams.

47h match time

vetted developers delivered within two days, faster than 99designs’ project cycle.

$0 placement fees

transparent subscription model with no commissions or contest costs.

1.5-year retention

long-term team integration versus short-term creative projects.

Wild.Codes vs 

99designs

Select a company to compare with Wild.Codes
99designs
Talent sourcing model
Wild.codes
Subscription model with pre-vetted devs ready to start
99designs
Contest-driven freelance marketplace for design projects
Vetting & verification
Wild.codes
Human + technical multi-step vetting, 5% pass rate
99designs
Platform relies on community reputation and ratings, not structured vetting
Engagement format
Wild.codes
Flexible monthly subscription, easy to scale
99designs
One-off design projects or short-term freelance engagements
Pricing transparency
Wild.codes
Flat monthly cost, clear invoice per dev
99designs
Variable project fees, tiered designer pricing, and platform commission
Time to hire
Wild.codes
47-hour delivery of first shortlist
99designs
Contest and selection process may take 3–10 days
Talent pool & regions
Wild.codes
EU, LatAm, India — balanced timezone coverage
99designs
Worldwide community of designers, less focused on tech talent
Tech & automation level
Wild.codes
AI-assisted matching (<10 min roadmap)
99designs
Manual selection or design contests; limited automation
Client control tools
Wild.codes
Success manager + transparent dashboard
99designs
Project management through contest interface, no live integration
Brand trust & image
Wild.codes
Clutch 4.9 / 5 from verified startups
99designs
Recognized design brand with global creative reputation
Unique value proposition
Wild.codes
Fast, human-first, transparent retention model
99designs
Design marketplace built for visuals, not engineering teams
Think this  works for you?
start hiring

High-performance hiring with Wild.Codes

+47 h

From brief to shortlist


Receive a curated shortlist of senior developers in just 47 hours — matched to your stack, culture, and roadmap goals.

+1.5 y

Built-to-last teams


Our developers stay because they grow — supported by training, community, and success management that drive real retention.

+5 %

Elite engineering culture


Only 5 % of applicants join our Talent Cloud — engineers who value ownership, clarity, and startup-ready mindset.

Trusted by founders
and tech leaders

Startups and growing tech companies choose Wild.Codes when they need reliable developers fast. These reviews show how we help teams hire quickly, work smoothly, and scale with confidence.

FAQ

What’s the main difference between Wild.Codes and 99designs?
Is 99designs faster than Wild.Codes?
How do their pricing models differ?
Which suits startups and SaaS companies better?
Who uses more automation and AI?
Which is more transparent in pricing?
Which platform has broader talent coverage?
Who provides better retention?
Which model is better for scaling teams?
Can Wild.Codes replace 99designs for tech hiring?

Still got questions?

1. Introduction: Why Compare Wild.Codes and 99designs

Both Wild.Codes and 99designs help companies access global talent — but they operate in entirely different industries.
99designs is a creative marketplace for designers, illustrators, and branding professionals.
Wild.Codes, by contrast, is a developer hiring platform built for SaaS companies, startups, and tech scale-ups that need vetted engineers quickly.
This comparison examines the contrast between creative outsourcing and technical team scaling — speed, pricing, and long-term value.

2. Understanding 99designs’ Business Model

99designs connects clients with a worldwide community of designers.
Clients either post a design contest — where multiple freelancers submit ideas — or hire a designer directly.
While the platform is efficient for one-off creative needs like logos, web layouts, or brand identities, it’s not built for ongoing or technical collaboration.
The pricing model depends on contest level, prize amount, and designer tier — often leading to varied costs and timelines.

3. How Wild.Codes Works

Wild.Codes operates as a subscription-based hiring service that delivers pre-vetted developers in under 47 hours.
Instead of posting ads or contests, companies subscribe to a monthly plan and gain access to engineers ready to join their team.
The process includes technical assessments, communication testing, and cultural fit verification — ensuring reliability and retention.
Wild.Codes bridges the gap between speed and quality, helping teams scale transparently and efficiently.

4. Key Difference: Subscription Hiring vs Creative Marketplace

The contrast between Wild.Codes and 99designs lies in intent and outcome.
99designs specializes in visual creation, not ongoing team building.
Wild.Codes focuses on long-term integration, helping tech companies add full-time engineers directly to their workflows.
Where 99designs delivers projects, Wild.Codes delivers people — vetted, available, and aligned with your product goals.

5. Vetting and Talent Quality

99designs relies on designer profiles, portfolios, and client ratings to determine quality.
There’s no centralized or technical vetting — the responsibility falls on the client.
Wild.Codes performs rigorous screening, from technical coding assessments to soft-skill interviews, approving only 5% of applicants.
That ensures you get professionals ready to perform from day one, without the uncertainty of contest-driven work.

6. Pricing and Cost Transparency

99designs uses tiered pricing based on contest level or designer reputation.
While flexible, this can lead to unpredictable total spend — depending on revisions, rounds, and custom agreements.
Wild.Codes eliminates all variables with a flat monthly fee per developer, covering everything from sourcing to replacement if needed.
For SaaS teams managing tight budgets, cost stability becomes a core advantage.

7. Speed and Time-to-Hire

Wild.Codes delivers shortlists within 47 hours, cutting typical hiring time by weeks.
99designs contests take longer: posting briefs, waiting for submissions, reviewing dozens of entries, and then finalizing a winner.
That structure fits creative iteration but not engineering deadlines.
When product teams need developers fast, Wild.Codes’ instant matching model drives true time-to-value.

8. Talent Pool and Global Reach

99designs has one of the world’s largest design communities — millions of creative professionals across 190+ countries.
Wild.Codes, meanwhile, curates a global developer network from Europe, Latin America, and Asia — with focus on coding quality, communication, and time-zone flexibility.
Both are global, but Wild.Codes’ scope is narrower by design, specializing in tech hires with proven product experience.

9. Technology, Automation, and Process

Wild.Codes integrates AI-driven matching that scores candidates by skills, engagement metrics, and predicted retention.
This data-driven system minimizes manual review and ensures precision.
99designs, while a strong creative community, relies on manual selection, portfolio browsing, and contest voting — processes centered on creativity, not automation.

10. Integration and Long-Term Engagement

Wild.Codes developers become part of your internal team — participating in sprints, standups, and version control.
There’s full ownership and communication transparency.
99designs designers are independent contractors working per project, with limited continuity after delivery.
If your goal is to grow a tech department, Wild.Codes supports integration rather than transactions.

11. Retention and Project Continuity

Wild.Codes developers stay with clients for an average of 1.5 years, ensuring stability and knowledge retention.
99designs projects typically end once a design is approved — with optional re-hire only if the freelancer is available.
This difference defines the value each provides: short-term output versus sustained capacity.

12. Brand Reputation and Market Fit

99designs is globally recognized as a leader in creative marketplaces, trusted by businesses for branding and design work.
Wild.Codes represents the next generation of hiring — merging tech recruitment with SaaS efficiency and transparent pricing.
Both are trusted in their fields, but Wild.Codes caters specifically to the developer economy, not the gig-based creative one.

13. Who Should Choose Wild.Codes

Choose Wild.Codes if you:

  • Need vetted developers within days, not weeks.

  • Want predictable monthly pricing with no middlemen.

  • Are building or scaling a SaaS or tech startup.
    Wild.Codes gives you a dedicated hiring engine, designed for flexibility and long-term collaboration.

14. When 99designs Makes Sense

99designs is perfect for companies needing:

  • Logo design, branding, or UI/UX concepts.

  • Short creative projects that don’t require long-term engagement.

  • A wide choice of visual directions via contests.
    For creative output, 99designs excels; for team scalability, Wild.Codes wins.

15. Final Verdict: Wild.Codes vs 99designs

Wild.Codes and 99designs both empower businesses through talent access — but their missions differ.
99designs offers creative solutions for visual identity and design.
Wild.Codes enables fast, transparent, and reliable developer hiring for growing SaaS and product teams.
If your goal is to scale your tech team efficiently and sustainably, Wild.Codes is the clear, long-term alternative to 99designs.

Privacy Preferences

Essential cookies
Required
Marketing cookies
Personalization cookies
Analytics cookies
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.